On Price and Perception

The very real value of branding

As prices goes down, demand goes up. That’s the usual economic formula. We all want more for less, right? Buy one, get one free! But in the case of “Veblen goods” (named after economist Thorstein Veblen), demand goes up as prices increase.

Why? A high-priced item is often a high-status item. As I recently blogged about, fMRIs of the brain suggest that the most important factor in a buying decision is how the product will affect our social standing. We’ll actually choose status over money. It’s that important to us. And we’re willing to pay for it.

We’ll pay a lot for it, actually. Clancy Martin, an ex-jeweler writing in the June 2010 issue of Harper’s magazine, claims that an $11,000 Rolex probably costs about $300 to make. The worst case of a Veblen good he ever heard of was from a friend who worked for Tiffany: he came across a bottle of perfume that retailed for $12,000, while Tiffany’s cost was around $40.

Call that a rip-off if you like (I won’t necessarily argue with you). Indeed, the “Veblen” label tends to be used as a kind of insult, implying fake value. But Rolex and Tiffany customers aren’t just buying a watch or a perfume. They’re buying the status that those brands have worked hard to convey. And as neuroscience has shown us (and common sense before that), social currency has real value.

I bring all this up because Veblen goods beautifully illustrate the power of branding. The difference between the concrete value of that watch, scented water, or whatever and the selling price is the value of the brand.

As advertising guru Rory Sutherland notes in a rather entertaining TED presentation, “Advertising adds value to a product by changing our perception, rather than the product itself.” And we marketing folks don’t have to feel bad about that, he asserts—I love this guy—because “a change in perceived value can be just as satisfying as what we consider ‘real’ value.”

It’s true. Just imagine that Rolex strapped to your wrist. It feels kind of good, doesn’t it?

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted in Branding, Marketing and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • I really like this post. So true. While reading it, I was trying to think of things that the "Veblen goods" concept wouldn't work for. By the nature of business, the value presented by Veblen items does not seem to resonate with the B2B dealings. I also believe that the product has to be of a superior quality for advertising to be able to build some serious perceived value around it. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this - would you say advertising could work its Veblen magic around virtually any product or does it have limitations?

  • bidwellid

    In general, I think you are right. Because luxury is tied to social standing it is best suited for the consumer market. I think there exist exceptions, especially in the B2B realm of top end craftsmanship. For example, Raredon Resources (in our building) provides high-end metal work for their clients: architects and planners. The architects and planners could bid out for the lowest priced vendor, but in that stratospheric market even the vendors need to to Veblenize.

  • Kosta Bolgov

    That's a great example, thanks for the insight!

blog comments powered by Disqus