What Is It I Don’t Think I’m Seeing?

Subliminal Messaging Moves Beyond Sex

ink-blotAfter my last blog two people asked me the same question. “Just curious,” they said, “but how effective is subliminal advertising?” Good question. It’s an ongoing debate. Some camps debunk it totally, but recent research is keeping the discussion alive.

The Skeptic’s Dictionary and Snopes say that there is no evidence subliminal messaging works. Early “evidence” turned out to be a hoax and has never been verifiable, most notably a 50s study that said subliminal messaging increased popcorn and Coke sales.

But for decades the discussion about subliminal advertising has not been about junk food; it has centered on the twin obsessions of sex and selling. The unproven assumption has been that hidden sexual messages trick us into buying. Culture sleuths point out that sex riddles advertising. It is represented in titillating photos (check out any New York Times Magazine). Supposedly, the word “sex” is even hidden in an ad for the (gasp!) United Methodist Church.

Still I have to ask, why even bother with the subliminal in this way? Many ads are so explicit that they hardly need a subliminal sexual reference. And I see the hidden word “sex” as a Rorschach inkblot test. You will find what you want to find. It says more about who is looking at the ad than the Mad Men (and women) of Madison Avenue.

Recent studies are finally moving beyond sex and selling. There is growing evidence that subliminal messaging does influence people. It is just subtler than we thought. And this is where I think it gets more interesting (okay, sex and selling is still kind of interesting).

In a recent experiment, Duke University wanted to see if subliminal exposure to well-known logos influenced future behavior. They found the people exposed to the Apple logo were more creative on a future test than people exposed to the IBM logo. The idea here is that subliminal exposure to a brand’s identity influenced behavior associated with that brand identity. Apparently, you are what you are exposed to.

Subliminal messaging does have advantages. Faced with an ever-growing number of messages, we are developing defense mechanisms to marketing. But subliminal messages don’t trigger these defense mechanisms. Furthermore, we usually think our own thoughts are the best. The subliminal can trick us into thinking a thought is actually ours (as the bumper sticker I saw last week warned: you don’t have to believe everything you think).

But one thing is needed for subliminal messaging to work on any level, as a University College London study found. You must be paying attention. The subliminal doesn’t stand a chance of influencing you unless you are tuned in to what is hiding the subliminal. This is why product placement is popular. You pay attention to movies and TV shows. You follow the story, and you don’t tune out the background as products glide by.

Is subliminal advertising effective? You better believe marketers are experimenting. Be careful what you are paying attention to. You may be seeing more than you know.

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted in Marketing, Sex, Subliminal and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Charlie Butter

    Subliminal messaging and the "mere exposure effect" This effect is pervasive: just expose subjects to a very brief stimulus - a novel pattern, face, melody and they later prefer thse things to new patterns, faces, etc. It also works for brands. Now the interesting part: the mere exposure effect works best if the stimulus is exposed very briefly, even for a few millisenconds and subjects often report they didn't see anything; in other words, subliminal (but later, influential. But with longer exposures, when they are confident they saw it, there is very little or no later preference. So what's going on here? I think that these demos of preference for unseen things reflect the operation of a PRE-RATIONAL processing system, unencombered by thoughts such as "Why the hell would I want anything like THAT?" which only ocur when you consciously see it and compare it (rationally) to the goodies you really like.

  • Does the concept of "lovemarks" need subliminal messaging to create the emotional connection they claim is stronger than branding?

  • admin

    Lovemarks is a marketing concept developed and promoted by the mega-marketing agency Saatchi & Saatchi. They describe Lovemarks as transcending brands, meaning they inspire a highly emotional--and thus more committed--level of customer loyalty. The hallmarks of a Lovemark are respect, mystery, sensuality, and intimacy.

    If we adopt that definition, then we can conclude that subliminal qualities are capable of enhancing the mysterious aspect of Lovemarks. But the subliminal is not needed. Establishing an emotional bond can happen in other ways. The most basic is that the product or service is, as they say in New Hampshire, "something wicked." Or as they say in the other 49 states: great.

    Do you have examples you are thinking of?

blog comments powered by Disqus